Full CBO Budget Forecast: “This Year’s Deficit Is Expected To Be The Second Largest Shortfall In The Past 65 Years”

by Tyler Durden

Summary from the CBO:

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that the federal budget deficit for 2010 will exceed $1.3 trillion—$71 billion below last year’s total and $27 billion lower than the amount that CBO projected in March 2010, when it issued its previous estimate. Relative to the size of the economy, this year’s deficit is expected to be the second largest shortfall in the past 65 years: At 9.1 percent of gross domestic product (GDP), it is exceeded only by last year’s deficit of 9.9 percent of GDP. As was the case last year, this year’s deficit is attributable in large part to a combination of weak revenues and elevated spending associated with the economic downturn and the policies implemented in response to it.

And some optimism from the CBO:

The Budget Outlook

Fiscal year 2010 will mark a change in the recent trends that have prevailed for both revenues and outlays. After falling sharply during the recession, revenues are projected to increase (in nominal dollars) for the first time in three years, rising by $38 billion, or about 2 percent. Outlays, which have grown rapidly in recent years because of the recession, the turmoil in financial markets, and policies enacted in response to those events, are expected to decline by about 1 percent.  On the basis of tax collections through July 2010, CBO expects federal revenues to total $2.1 trillion this fiscal year, or about 14.6 percent of GDP (see Summary Table 1). Gains in receipts in recent months indicate that federal revenues are beginning to recover from the recession.

In the period from October to December 2009, revenues were about 10 percent lower than in the same quarter a year earlier. But from January to July 2010, revenues were about 6 percent greater than in the comparable period of 2009.

Outlays are expected to total $3.5 trillion this year, or nearly 24 percent of GDP—a level slightly lower than the 25 percent share recorded last year but still much higher than the average level of roughly 21 percent of GDP over the past 40 years (see Summary Figure 1). Spending has dropped sharply this year for certain programs related to the federal government’s response to the turmoil in the housing and financial markets. For activities other than those programs, overall spending will rise by 10 percent in 2010, CBO estimates.

Over the next few years, federal budget deficits would decline markedly as a share of GDP if the current-law assumptions about fiscal policy in CBO’s baseline came to pass. Under those assumptions, the deficit would drop to 7.0 percent of GDP in 2011 and 4.2 percent in 2012 and then would reach a low of 2.5 percent of GDP in 2014. For the rest of the 10-year projection period, deficits would range between 2.6 percent and 3.0 percent of GDP, close to the average of 2.6 percent of GDP experienced over the past 40 years.

What a stunner – optimistic government projections… For exponential revenue hockeystick estimates, look no further than the chart below. Somehow we fail to see the 20% of unemployed (the real number, not the government’s) paying 50% more taxes.

Full budget update:

0

What Happens When China Stops Playing the Music?

Submitted by Faros Trading

What happens when China stops playing the music? (PDF)

Attachment Size
Attachment Size
FarosSpecialReport081910.pdf 95.4 KB

Gold, Silver, Oil & SP500 ETF Trends & Reversal Levels

Trading commodities and indexes through the use of exchange traded funds sure keeps things simple for an average trader. These funds allow individual investors to buy and sell things like gold, silver, oil, the sp500 and other investments which where not available only few months ago like “wheat” for example.

One of the nice things with ETFs is that is allows everyone to follow the price of a commodity or index using any charting website and can even apply indicators to help spot key support and resistance levels using volume by price analysis. There is no need for a expensive data feeds, charting programs and you don’t have to worry about contract expiration.

Below are a few charts of the trend and my short term forecast.

GLD – Gold Bullion ETF

As you can see gold broke out of its support zone this week and popped into the next resistance level. This is very typical price action in the stock market. It is important to look at the price charts like an apartment building. It’s nothing but a bunch of floors and ceilings.

How it works; if a ball breaks though a floor it will naturally fall to the next floor and bounce. The same for if a ball breaks through a ceiling, it will hit the next ceiling then bounce back down. This is essentially how the market moves.

SLV – Silver ETF

Silver is forming a large pennant and nearing its apex. With the amount of volume traded within this large volume channel I would expect a sharp breakout once a direction is made.

USO – Oil Traded Fund

Crude oil had a funky day. Early Wednesday morning in pre-market trading we saw virtually every investment drop at the same time which was strange. Anyways the US dollar dropped sharply and oil when down also. Normally as the dollar drops oil rockets higher but that was not the case today.

Currently oil is trading between two trendlines and is trying to hold up. If we get a breakdown then we could see a sharp drop in oil over the next 1-2 weeks.

SPY- SP500 ETF Trading Fund

The SP500 is trading within a high volume channel, similar to silver. Once a breakout in either direction is made I would expect a sizable move lasting a few w

Mid-Week Commodity and Index ETF Report:

In short, the market looks bearish for the short term of 5-10 trading sessions. This is because everything looks to be trading near resistance levels. That naturally brings sellers out of the woodwork putting pressure on prices.

Silver and gold stocks tend to lead the metals sector on breakouts so it will be important to keep an eye on them as we near a possible breakout or breakdown in the metals. If you see SLV or GDX ETFs out performing the GLD gold fund by 2-3x then I would expect to see gold move higher later that session or the following day.

The US dollar trend usually helps to identify if oil will have downward pressure or not. Also energy stocks tend to lead the price of oil by a few hours and some times a day. I keep an eye on XLE energy etf for a feel of how the energy stocks are doing and also UUP US dollar fund.

As for equities tech, financials and the Russell 2K (small cap stock) tend to lead the way for the broad market. Watching XLK, XLF and IWM help to confirm breakouts.

If you would like to Get My Trading Analysis and Alerts please join my free newsletter at: www.TheGoldAndOilGuy.com

Chris Vermeulen

Weekly Jobless Claims Reach 500,000

Tim

Well, it looks like we’re about to find out how equity markets react “when” weekly claims for unemployment insurance reach 500,000, the question of “if” no longer being relevant. According to this AP report, so far, not so good, that is, if you’re long.

Stock futures drop as jobless claims rise

Stock futures fall after claims for unemployment benefits rise unexpectedly

Stock futures are falling after a disappointing report on weekly claims for jobless benefits.

The Labor Department says initial claims for unemployment benefits jumped by 12,000 to 500,000 last week. Economists were expecting a small drop in claims. That renews worries about the pace of a recovery.

The jump in the number of people filing for unemployment benefits helped wipe out a sharp rise in futures Thursday that occurred following news that Intel Corp. is acquiring McAfee Inc.

It should be an interesting day… Leading economic indicators will be released in about an hour and more signs of slowing growth (if not an outright contraction) in manufacturing might be seen in the Philadelphia Fed survey.

GM IPO Beat Down

GM IPO Beat Down
GM filed documents Wednesday begging the SEC to approve an initial public offering. It seems once again GM thinks it can blow smoke up the American peoples ass and into thinking Taxpayers will be FULLY paid back. Much like GM did with the absurd Ed Whitacre commercials where he blatantly lied “the taxpayers have been paid back in full.” However the TRUTH is the US Taxpayers have not been paid back and never will be the roughly $50 billion for a 60% stake in the company we paid! Its time for a GM IPO beat down!

As reported in USA Today veteran IPO analyst Francis Gaskins predicts, “Taxpayers will take a 50% loss.” That’s because him and other analysts assume investors won’t value GM higher than Ford which has a $42 billion market capitalization. Even though GM and Ford had the same first-half revenue, Ford had twice the profits.

It’s a long shot but valuing GM even with Ford would make GM’s 500 million IPO shares worth $84 each. (Ya right…lol) But in order for Taxpayers to be fully repaid they would have to sell their 304 million shares for about $167. What are the odds of this happening? Ya I don’t think so.

Then to top it off in the “risk factors” section of the filing GM said, “our internal control over financial reporting” is “not effective” and that could “affect our ability to report accurately our financial condition …” They also warned their new CEO was “untested” in the auto business and that GM also said it has lost business because of “a negative public perception of our products,” and it can’t guarantee it will be able to change that.

So on top of a rocky IPO to begin with, GM openly stated they can’t accurately count their money, they have no faith in their new CEO and America has a negative perception of their products. Do you really think the US Taxpayers will be paid back? I wouldn’t count on it!

Was The Flash-Crash A “Forced Error”?

by Karl Denninger

A provocative question, to put it mildly.

It looks like it might have been.  In fact, Nanex appears to have solid information that implies quite strongly that the “Flash Crash” may have been engineered.

Specifically:

As small lags in time from quotes sent through CQS happen every day, the NBBO system cannot be relied upon and is meaningless until the time stamping mechanism has been fixed. This situation also makes the potential for latency arbitrage even more suspect as participants receiving premium NYSE products (as opposed to CQS) can detect these delays where-as others cannot. In the age of HFT’s, where quotes can be sent at rates exceeding 5,000 quotes per second for one issue and can effect the BBO, delays of even 200 milliseconds (or less) become a lifetime.

CQS (Consolidated Quotation System) is the method in which 99.9% of all US market participants receive their data and is also responsible for calculating the NBBO for all listed stocks. There are however premium products direct from the exchange which are not disseminated through CQS. One such product is OpenBook from NYSE. In comparing time stamps of quotes from CQS to OpenBook, it is clear this time delay exceeded 20 seconds in many cases.

Note that underlined section.

Now read this:

Conclusion: Put simply, if CQS (Consolidated Quotation System) does not determine that quotes from a given exchange are stale, the possibility of it choosing those quotes as the BBO is inevitable. It is obvious from these charts (and from those presented in out original Flash Crash Analysis) that the NYSE quotes are stale. Furthermore, since the quotes are time stamped when exiting CQS, other market participants could not detect the NYSE quotes (and therefor the current BBO) were stale.

Got it?

The only people who would know there was an exploitable problem are those who receive “premium” quote services – which is 0.1% of the market participants.  That explicitly doesn’t include you, me, or any other retail trader.

Further, those who “knew” there was an exploitable problem with the data could not have acted on it unless they knew it was possible – that is, it happened too fast for the computer to be reprogrammed at the time.

Therefore, those very same someone’s had to know in advance that this could happen, otherwise the selling and buying that happened during the event, which was essentially all machine-driven since we humans were a full twenty to thirty seconds behind real-time, couldn’t have occurred.

So we now appear to have established two things:

  • There was/is an exploitable problem in the quote feeds

    and

  • Some market participants knew it existed and how to exploit it before the flash-crash happened, and in fact programmed their computers to exploit it if and when it happened.

There’s an open question as to whether intentionally exploiting such a data dislocation is a violation of existing law.  I can make a colorable argument either way, given the requirements of securities law and the fact that issuing bids and offers with an intent not to execute but rather the manipulate the price (irrespective of how you do it) is a black-letter violation of those laws.

But with one final piece of the puzzle – which Nanex hasn’t yet found and identified to the best of my knowledge - we will then have what appears to be evidence of serious felonies.  That question is this:

Did one or more market participants cause the quote dislocation?

That is, did one or more participants not just take advantage of an arbitrage situation but rather did one or more participants not only subscribe to such a service but also cause the dislocation itself?

Nanex has raised the possibility of “Quote Stuffing” being part and parcel of the HFT game these days – that is, attempting to intentionally flood the quote system such as to cause other market participants to be unable to keep up with your quote flow (with said quotes not intended to execute, but rather to play “screw your buddy.”)  Such an act, if in fact it is happening, appears to be a clear-cut violation of securities law in that it is by definition intended to manipulate price through the indirect method of overrunning other participants’ ability to respond.

If in fact this has occurred in the past and is occurring today it would then seem to be rather obvious that we have a smoking gun – and one that demands investigation, identification of the parties involved in public, and the laying of charges.

So where is the SEC and Department of Justice in looking into this?

And incidentally, why is it legal in the first place to sell a “premium” quote service which has as it’s only selling feature, and therefore the only reason to pay for it, the promulgation of market data before anyone else has it, when the market is supposed to disseminate information to all participants at the same time?

NANEX material used with permission.

ETF Trading Signals – Low Risk Entries for ETF Funds HERE

Updated Forecasts for Gold and SP 500

In my last article a few weeks ago for Kitco.com, I was concerned that the market could have a hangover after the recent rally.  Apparently, my concern was not un-founded as we dropped from a rising bearish wedge near 1130, to the 1070 Fibonacci pivot earlier this week.  Although my subscribers were prepared for this drop by shorting the SP 500 in advance of that move, we covered our short near 1070 on the SP this week.

Bringing things up to speed, the market rallied up from July 1st to near 1130, which was a maximum target I mentioned in my last article.  This completed a 3-3-5 elliott wave pattern that I identified, and broke the rising wedge on cue.  At 1130, the SP 500 had re-traced a Fibonacci 61% of the April highs to Jul 1st lows, and had completed that re-tracement over a Fibonacci 5 week window. At TMTF, we believe that markets move in extremely reliable patterns and are not at all random.  At the 1221 SP 500 top in April, it landed exactly at a 61% Fibonacci upward re-tracement of the 2007 highs and the 2009 lows.  At the 2009 lows, the SP 500 had corrected 61% of the 1974 lows to 2000 highs right on the nose at 666!

What I forecast now is for a re-test of the 1011 area on the SP 500 to be completed likely by the end of August, and potentially a drop to 942 by the end of September and early October.  I realize this is not a popular forecast right now, but at a bare minimum we should expect the market to go back and bounce off the 1011 area where it bottomed on July 1st.  What would negate this view is if the SP 500 can rally past 1105 this week and hold into next week, then we may expect the bulls to re-take control.  Another interesting point is when the market did in fact bottom at 1011, it was a Fibonacci Intersection.  By that I mean it re-traced 38% of the 2009 lows to 2010 highs, and also was at the exact 38% pivot of the 2007 highs to 2009 lows at the same time. This gives pretty strong support for a 2010 market bottom, with the re-test possible.

I expect Gold to complete it’s “B wave” bounce at 1225-1238 ranges, and pull back to re-test the $1,155 recent low, but possibly stopping around $1177.  That recent pivot low was a 50% Fibonacci re-tracement of the February lows and June highs of this year.  Again, markets actually move in reliable patterns as they are largely controlled by the crowd’s sentimental reactions to news and events, which tend to be the same over time no matter the conditions.  The downside to Gold is that we have had 8 consecutive years of Gold ending the calendar year in positive territory, and somewhere along the line that trend is likely to be interrupted.  The lower level projections I have for gold are a deeper re-tracement to as low as $1,040 by the end of this year, correcting a recent 21 Fibonacci month advance.  The probabilities as outlined on my chart below are for $1,177, a 38% Fibonacci figure.

If you enjoy our work, please consider subscribing to our forecast service while the “Charter Rates” are still in effect through August.  Prices will be increasing in early September. Also, you may sign up for free updates which are limited at www.markettrendforecast.com

GLD Adds 7.9 Tonnes to the Trust

Tim Iacono

Reversing the trend that began in early-July and then accelerated later in the month, the “tonnes in the trust” at the popular SPDR Gold Shares ETF (NYSE:GLD) has been rising in recent weeks, the largest addition in over two months occurring just yesterday.

Some of this new buying could have come from Eton Park Capital Management as they recently disclosed via regulatory filings that their hedge fund holdings of GLD went from zero in the first quarter to nearly $800 million in the second quarter. John Paulson reported that his hedge funds now own 31.5 million shares of GLD,  unchanged from the first quarter, and he remains the ETF’s largest holder at just under $4 billion.

The Bernanke Cycle

Courtesy of Joshua M Brown, The Reformed Broker

“Eighty-one percent of the jobs lost in America were from small business,”

-Senator Mary L. Landrieu, (D) Louisiana and chairwoman of the small-business committee

One of my pet topics here is the utter neglect of small businesses, which have been completely ignored during the race to stimulate and reflate The Systemic Six banks.  In a press release from something called Industry Source Network, this systemic neglect is given a name - The Bernanke Cycle…

The Bernanke Cycle works as follows:

1. Small business gets battered by the economy.  The business is still profitable but less so than before.

2. The business sees its lending facility pared back or eliminated by their bank.

3. Small business cuts jobs, moves to a smaller building or stops future equipment orders so that their expenses reflect the reality of their new lower revenues.

4. These cuts also negatively impact other small businesses associated with the small business’ supply chain which gives the cycle a multiplier effect.

5. Small business owner takes their austerity program to their lender in hopes of restoring some of their lost borrowing capabilities.  The lender looks at the lower revenues, layoffs and downsizing as a further deterioration of the business.  The lender lowers the business’s line of credit even further.

6. The business now has to run on even less cash and is not able to replenish inventory at the levels needed to grow its business.

7. Go back to step 1 and repeat until the business becomes truly uncreditworthy and eventually becomes insolvent.

I couldn’t agree more, and I see very little being done to help, either nominally or tactically.

Source:

Feder: “We May See the Bottom Fall Out”

Tim Iacono

Radar Logic CEO Michael Feder talks to Matt Miller and Carol Massar of Bloomberg about the housing market, saying home sales this summer are likely to be the “lowest activity in years” as a result of the homebuyer tax credit pulling so much demand forward in the spring.

The headline this interview generated at Bloomberg appears in the title of this post above. Feder notes that home sales could decline anywhere between 10 percent and 40 percent now that homebuyers are no longer being paid to buy houses.